Guardians of Grail Forum Index Guardians of Grail
The best PVKII Clan
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   GalleriesGalleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Passengers due to flight delays ask show fee losin

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Guardians of Grail Forum Index -> Computer
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
zekjhiryyh
Post Master
Post Master



Joined: 14 Jun 2013
Posts: 3378
Read: 0 topics

Warns: 0/5
Location: England

PostPosted: Wed 22:15, 20 Nov 2013    Post subject: Passengers due to flight delays ask show fee losin

's Court over this first "show fee claims," ​​the first instance verdict,[url=http://www.atc.unican.es/cl.php]louboutin pas cher[/url], the verdict states: finds airline defaults, but does not support the passengers claims,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/peuterey.php]peuterey[/url], decree passengers lost. Mr. Zhang is the Urumqi public,[url=http://www.iprase.tn.it/woolrich.php]woolrich outlet[/url], November 10, 2011, he purchased a through Ctrip at 14:30 on November 12, 2011 by Hangzhou to Urumqi flights. 21 o'clock the next day, Zhang told Ctrip customer service call,[url=http://www.iprase.tn.it/hogan.php]hogan[/url], the flight due to "deploy" reasons, must go to at 17:30 on the 12th to take off,[url=http://www.iprase.tn.it/hogan.php]hogan outlet[/url], a delay of three hours, ticketing initiative to compensate a party Ctrip Zhang 6000 Credits. After Mr. Zhang will airline taken to court, ask for compensation for breach of contract, including 0.5 yuan of economic losses, including 9.1 yuan. New urban Urumqi People's Court after hearing that the original defendant, passenger transport between the contract was valid,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/woolrich_outlet.php]woolrich[/url], the parties shall agree to fulfill their rights and obligations. Case, the airlines due to their own internal capacity allocation for flight delays because of the fact that there is no objection,[url=http://www.bishopsboardshop.com/]doudoune moncler pas cher[/url], pursuant to which the court finds airline carrier can not fulfill obligations in accordance with agreed time behavior of the passengers constitute a breach of contract,[url=http://www.iprase.tn.it/woolrich.php]woolrich[/url], but for the passenger's claims in this case not supported. Court elaborated unsupported two reasons: one, the passenger's 0.5 yuan penalty is neither a legal basis nor contractual basis. Second, the plaintiff claims telephone charges 8.6 yuan economic loss court is not supported. Under the "Civil Aviation" Article 126 provides: "passengers, baggage or cargo air transport damage caused by delay, the carrier shall be liable, however, the carrier proves himself or his subject hire the agent in order to avoid losses, all necessary measures have been taken or impossible to take such measures, it is not responsible. " Case, one day in advance to inform passengers of airline flight delays, for breach of contract to take effective remedial measures. In addition, due to reasons for flight delays,[url=http://www.jchs.com/includes/throwback-nfl-jerseys/]nfl jerseys[/url], ticket party Ctrip has extra help passengers 6,[url=http://www.birtenshaw.org.uk/misc/top.php]hollister outlet[/url],000 points, points although it can not be redeemed for cash, but can be exchanged for valuable gifts can be considered for financial compensation to passengers. In this regard, Zhang believes that since the court found that airline defaults,[url=http://www.atc.unican.es/hco.php]hollister[/url], airlines should bear the liability,[url=http://www.bishopsboardshop.com/]doudoune moncler[/url], consumer advocates 0.5 yuan penalty merely symbolic, compared to hundreds of hundred dollars for a fee refund, but the drop in the bucket. As Ctrip grants 6000 points and can not be equated airline passengers compensation because Ctrip and the airlines are separate subject. Currently, the first instance verdict against Mr. Chang has Urumqi Intermediate People's Court of Appeal.
相关的主题文章:


[url=http://www.py-q.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1758439&fromuid=185941]http://www.py-q.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1758439&fromuid=185941[/url]

[url=http://park16.wakwak.com/~sakura2nd/cgi-bin/yybbs.cgi%3Fpage%3D60]http://park16.wakwak.com/~sakura2nd/cgi-bin/yybbs.cgi%3Fpage%3D60[/url]

[url=http://210.136.98.177/cgi-bin/bbs/yybbs.cgi/yybbs.cgi]http://210.136.98.177/cgi-bin/bbs/yybbs.cgi/yybbs.cgi[/url]

[url=http://91yxt.com/bbs/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=]http://91yxt.com/bbs/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=[/url]

[url=http://www.grasp-the-nettle.com/webhosting/free-wordpress-website/#comment-410883]http://www.grasp-the-nettle.com/webhosting/free-wordpress-website/#comment-410883[/url]

[url=http://richcareer.net/#comment-329833]http://richcareer.net/#comment-329833[/url]

[url=http://www5.pf-x.net/~okzoo/epad/epad.cgi]http://www5.pf-x.net/~okzoo/epad/epad.cgi[/url]

[url=http://kubikino.ne.jp/cgi-def/admin/C-002/sekikawa/visit/main.pl?PAGE_NUM=1]http://kubikino.ne.jp/cgi-def/admin/C-002/sekikawa/visit/main.pl?PAGE_NUM=1[/url]


The post has been approved 0 times
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Guardians of Grail Forum Index -> Computer All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin