Guardians of Grail

cheapbag214s · Posted: Fri 1:49, 06 Sep 2013 Post subject: Closing Bell Update for February 3

Closing Bell Update for February 3,[url=http://duveticajacketssalejp.halod.com/][b]デュベチカ専売店[/b][/url]
The weekend is almost here,[url=http://duveticajacketsoutletjp.albirank.net/][b]デュベティカダウンジャケット[/b][/url], the middle of the country is under two feet of snow,[url=http://discount2013duveticajackets.webmium.com/][b]デュベティカ専売店[/b][/url], and Egypt is getting violent. that not why you here, is it?:
The SEC announced a number of enforcement actions today:
The SEC settled charges that TD Ameritrade failed to supervise its registered representatives when they sold shares of the Reserve Yield Plus Fund money market fund for some $10 million [SEC]
Charges against three AXA Rosenberg entities were settled for more than $240 million,[url=http://duveticashoponline.webmium.com/][b]デュベティカ店舗東京[/b][/url]. SEC had alleged that the entities had concealed an error in a quantitative investment model [SEC]
The SEC filed charges against six "expert network" consultants for allegedly tipping hedge funds and others [SEC]
Moody thinks that the CFTC swap-trading rules may limit market entrants [BusinessWeek]
House Republicans have narrowed their sights on the Volcker Rule [Reuters]
State securities regulators don want Dodd-Frank watered down [Reuters]
It turns out that lending money to banks through TARP may not have been such a bad deal after all [Treasury]
NEXT POST
Deep Thoughts on Say-on-Pay Rules (Editor's Note: This is the first in an occasional series about the policy implications of securities law and market regulation. The goal here is to foster a conversation in the comments section. My objective is to promote this conversation by asking a few questions,[url=http://duveticajacketsjp.albirank.net/][b]デュベティカダウンジャケット[/b][/url], the answers to which I would genuinely like,[url=http://duveticajacketsshopjp.gengfl.com/][b]デュベティカダウンジャケット[/b][/url], even if I think some of them are unknowable. I apologize in advance for the school-marmishness of the format.) Now that the SEC has adopted its "say-on-pay" rules,[url=http://duveticajacketsshopjp.gengfl.com/][b]デュベティカ店舗[/b][/url], one company has already seen its executive compensation packages get rejected in an advisory vote. Query: Why would shareholders ever approve a "say-on-pay" resolution? Any money that doesn't go to top executives would go to them (through dividends or otherwise),[url=http://duveticadownjackets.webmium.com/][b]Duvetica Jackets Outlet Shop[/b][/url], presumably, so what's their incentive? Does the fact that the vote is only advisory give shareholders an ability to engage in costless "shaming" behavior,[url=http://duveticajacketsjp.albirank.net/][b]デュベティカアウトレット[/b][/url], calling out well-heeled executives without running the risk of actually pissing them off? If the shareholder votes were binding,[url=http://duveticajacketssalejp.albirank.net/][b]デュベティカレディースダウンジャケット[/b][/url], would compensation package rejections become more common? Perhaps shareholders would approve a "say-on-pay" resolution because they want to keep their companies competitive,[url=http://parajumperslongbear.webmium.com/][b]http://parajumperslongbear.webmium.com/[/b][/url], and they believe that attracting top management is an important component of that. To what.
PREVIOUS POST
Showing Your Private Parts: Proposed CFTC and SEC Rules on Disclosure of Risk Information by Advisers to Private Funds Last week,[url=http://duveticajacketsonlinejp.halod.com/][b]デュベティカ店舗[/b][/url], the SEC and the CFTC jointly proposed rules to require that advisers to private funds disclose certain information about the funds they manage. The Commissions' proposing release indicated that the information would be used to support the Financial Stability Oversight Council's efforts to monitor systemic risk in the financial system. The proposal fulfills the Commissions' obligations under Section 404 of the Dodd-Frank Act,[url=http://duveticatrenchcoat.webmium.com/][b]デュベティカ店舗[/b][/url], and would add new Advisers Act Rule 204(b)-1,[url=http://duveticajacketssalejp.halod.com/][b]デュベティカアウトレット[/b][/url], amend Rule 4.27 of the Commodity Exchange Act,[url=http://duveticajacketsjp.albirank.net/][b]デュベチカ専売店[/b][/url], and adopt new Form PF on which advisers to private funds would make their required reports. financial system. Under the Dodd-Frank Act,[url=http://duveticajacketsonlinejp.halod.com/][b]デュベチカ専売店[/b][/url], the Oversight Council is to be aided in its responsibilities by various federal regulatory agencies,[url=http://duveticaonline.halod.com/][b]デュベティカダウンジャケット[/b][/url], including the Commissions. To further this end,[url=http://duveticajacketsonlinejp.halod.com/][b]デュベチカ通販[/b][/url], Dodd-Frank requires hedge fund advisers to register with the SEC under the Advisers Act and amended Section 204(b) of the Advisers Act to mandate reporting by such advisers. The Commissions' rule proposal is designed to implement that requirement. New Reporting Obligations Under the proposal,[url=http://discount2013duveticajackets.webmium.com/][b]デュベチカ通販[/b][/url], advisers to private funds,[url=http://duveticashop.webmium.com/][b]デュベティカアウトレット[/b][/url], which is defined.
相关的主题文章：

[url=http://bbs.bj100.com/]http://bbs.bj100.com/[/url]

[url=http://lvhuiw.com/lvlt/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9174795]http://lvhuiw.com/lvlt/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9174795[/url]

[url=http://t.2fou.com/thread-1117403-1-1.html]http://t.2fou.com/thread-1117403-1-1.html[/url]

[url=http://www.icarfans.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1092416]http://www.icarfans.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1092416[/url]

[url=http://www.wsyc.com/forum/null]http://www.wsyc.com/forum/null[/url]

[url=http://www.rpsns.com/viewthread.php?tid=531398&extra=]http://www.rpsns.com/viewthread.php?tid=531398&extra=[/url]

[url=http://www.fesghelchat.com/cloob/]http://www.fesghelchat.com/cloob/[/url]

[url=http://jieai.net/]http://jieai.net/[/url]

[url=http://86jujia.com/2013/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1121805&extra=]http://86jujia.com/2013/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1121805&extra=[/url]

[url=http://www.chuangxinjidi.net/discuz/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=77754]http://www.chuangxinjidi.net/discuz/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=77754[/url]

[url=http://formula-x.5d6d.com/]http://formula-x.5d6d.com/[/url]

[url=http://www.npdx.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=386835]http://www.npdx.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=386835[/url]

[url=http://www.cnshmo.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=263346&extra=]http://www.cnshmo.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=263346&extra=[/url]

[url=http://bbs.igoba.com/read.php?tid=164450]http://bbs.igoba.com/read.php?tid=164450[/url]

[url=http://www.move-grp.co.jp/p/postmail.cgi]http://www.move-grp.co.jp/p/postmail.cgi[/url]